And then yesterday, I read this from Hosea 11
1 "When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son.
2 But the more I called Israel, the further they went from me. They sacrificed to the Baals and they burned incense to images.
3 It was I who taught Ephraim to walk, taking them by the arms; but they did not realise it was I who healed them.
4 I led them with cords of human kindness, with ties of love; I lifted the yoke from their neck and bent down to feed them.
Sounds familiar?
That is because Matthew uses Hosea 11:1 to quote in Matthew 2:15
15 where he stayed until the death of Herod. And so was fulfilled what the Lord had said through the prophet: "Out of Egypt I called my son."
It seems to me two absolutely contrary passages... In Hosea, Israel is described as a son who is rebellious...
Except, that The Lord gave specific insight to Matthew and Matthew lifted Hosea 11:1 out of context as it were to apply it to Jesus.
I am not saying there is error. What I am saying is that using our own understanding of how we interprete scriptures, we will not be able to understand prophecy (things future) clearly until it is revealed in its own time.