|
Unreported News, Commentary, Resources and Discussion of Bible Prophecy
|
1whowaits wrote:And how can Israel viewed as 'peaceful' by a muslim leader, (who would likely be a radical himself as he appears to lead radical muslim nations), the radical muslims consider Israel anything but peaceful. And Israel living in 'safety' with radical muslim nations surrounding it, calling for it's destruction, how is that safety?
1whowaits wrote:So it is concievable that the quartet could have the power to keep the muslim nations and Israel apart, by military force and threats. And the quartet would likely guantee Israel's saftey, so that she would give up her nuclear weapons (which they are also trying to do), so Israel could dwell in saftey surrounded by Islamic nations if her saftey were guaranteed by a stronger entity. And Israel would likely be unsuspecting of attack by the members of the quartet, or at least a couple of them. Israel probably wouldn't trust the UN, but would the US and the EU, And Russia is also being attacked by Islamic radicals and Israel has suggested a partnership between the 2 in the past so a relationship between Israel and Russia is conceiveable.
1. A people in Asia Minor. In the Table of Nations in Genesis chapter 10, Meshech is listed after Javan and Tubal as the sixth son of Japheth. It is generally identified with Mushki of Assyrian, and Moschoi of classical sources. The first known mention dates from 1116 B.C. in the first year of Tiglath-Pileser I, who vanquished the five kings of Mushki ruling in the southeastern part of Anatolia. They are mentioned again in Assyrian sources from the reign of Ashurnasirpal II (884-859 B.C.) as paying a tribute of copper vessels, cattle and wine. They do not appear in the Assyrian sources from the era of Assyrian decline, but are mentioned again in conjunction with clashes with Assyrians in the period of Shalmaneser V, reaching a climax in the reign of Sargon (722-705 B.C.). The Assyrian sources seem to identify Mita king of the Meshech with Midas of the Greek sources. This indicates that the peoples the Greeks called Phrygians are the Mushki of the Assyrians. The statement in Psalm 120:5 "Woe is me, that I sojourn in Meshech, that I dwell in the tents of Kedar" refers to Meshech as the border of the civilized world in the north, as Kedar was its southeastern extremity in the Babylonian and Persian periods, Meshech and Tubal denote the land of central Anatolia and its peoples (Ezek 32:26). Meshech, Tubal and Javan (i.e. Greece) traded in slaves and copper vessels (Ezek 39:1).
http://www.answers.com/topic/meshech
A kingdom in Asia Minor, listed in the Table of Nations among the sons of Japheth (Gen 10:2; I Chr 1:5). It is also mentioned in Ezekiel (27:13; 32:26; 38:2-3; 39:1) and once in Isaiah (66:19), almost always with its neighbor Meshech. It has been identified with the Tabal of Assyrian sources, and, usually, with the Tybarenoi of classical sources.
http://www.answers.com/topic/tubal-1
1whowaits wrote:Mr Baldy, i would agree that the land will be divided, i believe that is what Zech 1 is indicationg, but what leads into that scenairo or what preceeds that division. With this unrest in Eygpt and in other muslim nations considered 'moderate', many have stated the peace process will be delayed significantly if not dead altogether.
If the peace process is dead will Israel allow her land to be divided? -unlikely. As her land will be divided, apparently be a group of 4 according to Zech 1, what happens next?
1whowaits wrote:Doug, i also felt that Israel could previously have been viewed as in a state of 'peace', kliving in it own 'security'. But the sitiuation in Egypt may have changed that, the muslim brotherhood has stated 'prepare for war with Israel' and Israel has taken note of this at all levels. Ezek 38 portrays Israel as 'peaceful and unsuspecting' and living in safety, is that the current situation in Israel? With the events in Egypt and Lebanon and the realization that similar changes could occur in Jordan and other muslim nations the period of 'peace', as cold as it was, has now passed, imo. Considering that there will be a period in which Israel is peaceful and unsuspecting living in the center of the land (because it has been divided?) what is next?
1whowaits wrote:Doug, i am thinking the PS 83/destruction of Damascus scenario is likely the next event, before it was not clear how Jordan and Egypt would be involved but now it appears to only be a matter of time. Another puzzle piece has been put into place, prophecy is visibly moving forward.
1whowaits wrote:Doug, i am thinking the PS 83/destruction of Damascus scenario is likely the next event, before it was not clear how Jordan and Egypt would be involved but now it appears to only be a matter of time. Another puzzle piece has been put into place, prophecy is visibly moving forward.
Douggg wrote:1whowaits wrote:Doug, i am thinking the PS 83/destruction of Damascus scenario is likely the next event, before it was not clear how Jordan and Egypt would be involved but now it appears to only be a matter of time. Another puzzle piece has been put into place, prophecy is visibly moving forward.
I see your point. What that guy's name who recently was first to put the PS 83 theory in the fore-front? The PS 83 inner circle of nations theory is not that old.
Doug L.
SwordofGideon wrote:Douggg wrote:1whowaits wrote:Doug, i am thinking the PS 83/destruction of Damascus scenario is likely the next event, before it was not clear how Jordan and Egypt would be involved but now it appears to only be a matter of time. Another puzzle piece has been put into place, prophecy is visibly moving forward.
I see your point. What that guy's name who recently was first to put the PS 83 theory in the fore-front? The PS 83 inner circle of nations theory is not that old.
Doug L.
Bill Salus, I don't know if he was the first but he certainly is one of the biggest proponents.
Mrs. B wrote:Wherefore Art Thou, Gog?
We see Gog in Ezekiel.......and Again in Revelation....
Is Gog both before the thousand years and after?
is Gog the same? one before the Kingdom is set up and the same after the thousand years?
Rev. 20:7...And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,
8...And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Ma-gog, to gather them together to battle:
the number of whom is as the sand of the sea....
If so....then Gog and Magog must be satan.....in a person...
I'm not dis counting anything already said.....Just asking a question....
this is something I still do not understand...
Mrs. B
all


But my main point is that i do believe Israel will ever again be 'peaceful and unsuspecting' of any muslim leader in the future, not even a leader of Turkey, suggesting that Gog may not be a muslim leader.
Seeker wrote:There will be a covenant with many signed that begins the last 7 years.


And that's why the Muslims call us hypocrites because this is the vomit that comes out of our "Christian Nation"

shorttribber wrote:Ezk 38
10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; It shall also come to pass, [that] at the same time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil thought:
11 And thou shalt say, I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates,
12 To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places [that are now] inhabited, and upon the people [that are] gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land.
AT THE SAME TIME.........something else will come to mind..........Does Israel dwell without bars or gates...or walls?Does Israel have and abundance of Cattle in the MIDST of their land? What OTHER nation fits this description?
The US has walls and gates...but not greatly so as Israel does for their enormous security needs........The US is the land spoken of in verses 11 and 12. The attack will happen nearly at the same time IMO.
Anybody ever see vast numbers of cattle in the MIDST of Israel.......anyone?...............Anybody ever see VAST numbers of cattle in the MIDST of the US?.............

SwordofGideon wrote:And that's why the Muslims call us hypocrites because this is the vomit that comes out of our "Christian Nation"
What's the old saying, when you point a finger at someone there's three fingers pointing back at you. Muslims claim Islam is a religion of peace yet all it produces is death, how's that for hypocrisy. Muslims hate us because 1)All non-Muslims are infidels, 2)We are "perceived" as a Christian Nation 3)We support Israel.
extravagantchristian wrote:I know what you're saying, I was just pointing out the way the rest of the world perceives us... and particularly the Muslim world because look at how fiercely they serve their God... they are willing to die for him.... they get up at 6am for a call to prayer each day... Our Bible says that sexual immorality is a sin, but look at what is socially acceptable for our women to wear and what we watch on TV and Movies. You don't see that going on in Muslim Nations. Jesus, our MASTER was poor and humble but look at the "American Dream" ... Smart phones, flat screens, new cars and houses we cant pay for. And a financially irresponsible government as well, that we have elected. We're in debt up to our eye balls... personally and collectively.
They are so much more devoted to their God that we are to ours... as a whole... as a nation... so our hypocrisy is that much more obvious in their eyes. And while we may be conditioned to it, and lulled into thinking it's all ok, God sees it too and it's only a matter of time before He makes an example of this country... IMO. Remember 9/11.
what a shame it is too........God will be changing us all VERY soon.....and only those who truely love and know Him will stand.
I know what you're saying, I was just pointing out the way the rest of the world perceives us
1whowaits wrote:EC, i believe Rev 17 is actually referring to Jerusalem as Babylon, the characteristics listed of the woman are mentioned about Israel elsewhere in scripture and Jerusalem has been known as the city on 7 hills. This city is stated to rule the world so it would appear to be the city that the AC rules from and yet the AC and the 10 kings hate the city and burn it, why would they destroy their own city unless they knew they were going to lose it to the returning conqueror?
Rev 16 describes God's wrath poured out on Babylon, the great city(the great city is referred to earlier as the place where the Lord was crucified) at armageddon, and Rev 17 goes back in time to describe Babylon prior to its destruction. Rev 18 then appears to change the venue with 'After this I saw another angel..', and he appears to describe a totally different Babylon than that depicted in Rev 17.
So the question would be whether John was going back further in time in Rev 18 to see a previous Babylon different from that in Rev 17, or was he seeing the same Babylon in Rev 17 and 18? I believe because the angels repeats the term fallen- 'Fallen! Fallen is Babylon the Great!' he is indicating that 2 different falls of Babylon are being depicted from 2 separate time periods. And the US would appear to be the Babylon in Rev 18.


1whowaits wrote:ST, thanks, i would agree that the US is included in a somewhat simultaneous destruction, but i see Ezek 38 referring to Israel, Israel will be without bars and gates because she is trusts in someone other that God for her security- 'They will forget their shame and all their unfaithfulness that they showed toward me when they lived in safety with no one to make them afraid.'
God considers them unfaithful becuase they live in safety and do not rely on him, as in the past they rely on another nation for safety (who would they rely on?). And they dwell in the center of the land because they likely have lost Gaza and the west bank and the Golan, the land has been divided and they have lost the outlying areas so they have to dwell in the center of the land.
I believe the simultaneous destruction of the US would be around the time of the destruction of Damascus in Isa 17, as Babylon appears to be linked with those nations in Isa 19 and perhaps 18, and Jer 50-51.
Or as the destruction of Damascus does appear linked to the Gog-Magog battle in Isa 17 and Jer 49, the US may suffer the destruction at Gog-Magog because the US is Magog and Gog is leading the muslim armies (Israel is unsuspecting of Gog and God sends fire on Magog and the coastlands, Magog may have been part of the Babylonian empire at the time of Ezekiel, who rules Babylon now?).
again.............Jerusalem (city of peace/capital place of old covenant of peace year to year system) Hub of Judaism today.
Seeker, what i am getting at is not the past but what Ezek 38 indicates for the future, there will be a time when Gog views Israel as peaceful and unsuspecting, likely because Israel is peaceful and unsuspecting of Gog. That has not really been the case in the past, and it is all the more unlikely now for any muslim nation, Israel will view any muslim nation or leader as worthy of suspiscion because they have now proved that they cannot be relied upon, they cannot be trusted, they can turn radical at any time, and radicals want Israel dead.
And muslims will never allow the Israelis to build a temple on an area that is an Islamic holy site, that would go against the very religon of Islam, they have no choice but to fight such an act. And there is no reason for muslims, especially the radicals, to ever make a treaty with Israel so that a temple could be built, what would the muslims get out of it? It would be a sin for them to allow a temple to be built, would they risk their eternal state for land or peace so Israel could build a temple? The radicals want a war, they believe that their Mahdi will come if there is a war, there is no reason to give in to Israel, they want conflict, they want destruction.
extravagantchristian wrote:couchmillenniumcough ahem... scuse me


Daniel 9:27
27And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
extravagantchristian wrote:And one more thing... people expect the AOD to happen exactly 3.5 years into a 7 year covenant, but I don't see that...
extravagantchristian wrote:So the way I see it, the AOD could happen at anytime during the 7 year covenant of the AC. And just because the AC makes a 7 year covenant doesn't mean that the Lord couldn't cut that time short and come back whenever He wants to.


Return to Prophecy Debate Area
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
”