Dead Octupi in Portugal

[Loop]

Dead Octupi in Portugal


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTjffj0Sgek&feature=player_embedded

[drdos]

There are comments on this vid that say this is old footage from last January

[Jericho]

There are comments on this vid that say this is old footage from last January

That's the thing, animals do die in mass all the time. Only now people are paying attention and keeping track of it. That's why I'm not convinced all these dead animals mean anything.

[drdos]

There are comments on this vid that say this is old footage from last January

That's the thing, animals do die in mass all the time. Only now people are paying attention and keeping track of it. That's the reason I'm not convinced all these dead animals mean anything.

Yeah creation has been dieing since Adam and Eve sinned. The point is that the video says 1/18/11 and claiming to be part of what has been happening since the start of 2011. My point is that people are saying this Youtuber is scamming people. As far as dead animals go weather it is more frequent or not matters in that other signs are happening in conjunction with wild life dieing.

[amessenger4god]

I disagree. It's true that there are yearly mass animal deaths, but most have followed natural disasters or chemical dumps. For example, millions of fish were found dead in Pakistan last year concurrent with that country's flooding.

Michio Kaku, the first major proponent on the media of the theory that these deaths have just been underreported until now, proved his point wrong with his own words.

On Fox News he mentioned that there are approximately 158 mass animal deaths per year (though he gave no examples of what a common "mass death" would be; the current mass deaths have been unexplainable--I imagine "common" ones are usually the result of drought and disease) and that, therefore, "nothing" is going on.

So, let's just consider the numbers. 158 mass deaths per year is the equivalent to 1 mass death every 2.3 days (about every 55 hours).

The current mass deaths seem to have begun about 2 and a half weeks ago around New Years. During just the first 5 days, there were at least 30 mass animal deaths, which averages out to 6 mass deaths per day: http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&msa=0&msid=201817256339889828327.0004991bca25af104a22b&ll=28.921631,5.273438&spn=141.542315,12.304687&z=2&iwloc=0004991c2e41cf55affcb

That is about 15x the normal rate. 15x. If the rate continues there will be around 2200 mass animal deaths in 2011. And considering that just in the last couple days we've had 371 dead birds fall in front of the CNN building, hundreds of seals wash up in Canada, 200 cows keel over in Wisconsin, thousands of buffalo in Vietnam, hundreds of birds in Alabama, and more... it appears as though the new rate is holding.

Just doing a quick search on Google I can see that many discussions on this issue from all across the web are silenced when someone interjects the 158-168 per year figure. Everyone just assumes that ends the debate, but they don't take the time to consider what that figure means.

[drdos]

I disagree. It's true that there are yearly mass animal deaths, but most have followed natural disasters or chemical dumps. For example, millions of fish were found dead in Pakistan last year concurrent with that country's flooding.

Michio Kaku, the first major proponent on the media of the theory that these deaths have just been underreported until now, proved his point wrong with his own words.

On Fox News he mentioned that there are approximately 158 mass animal deaths per year (though he gave no examples of what a common "mass death" would be; the current mass deaths have been unexplainable--I imagine "common" ones are usually the result of drought and disease) and that, therefore, "nothing" is going on.

So, let's just consider the numbers. 158 mass deaths per year is the equivalent to 1 mass death every 2.3 days (about every 55 hours).

The current mass deaths seem to have begun about 2 and a half weeks ago around New Years. During just the first 5 days, there were at least 30 mass animal deaths, which averages out to 6 mass deaths per day: http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&msa=0&msid=201817256339889828327.0004991bca25af104a22b&ll=28.921631,5.273438&spn=141.542315,12.304687&z=2&iwloc=0004991c2e41cf55affcb

That is about 15x the normal rate. 15x. If the rate continues there will be around 2200 mass animal deaths in 2011. And considering that just in the last couple days we've had 371 dead birds fall in front of the CNN building, hundreds of seals wash up in Canada, 200 cows keel over in Wisconsin, thousands of buffalo in Vietnam, hundreds of birds in Alabama, and more... it appears as though the new rate is holding.

Just doing a quick search on Google I can see that many discussions on this issue from all across the web are silenced when someone interjects the 158-168 per year figure. Everyone just assumes that ends the debate, but they don't take the time to consider what that figure means.

Not sure who your disagreeing with but just wanted to say I agree with you. My point is that since the fall all life has been shortened on earth, but the frequency of these animal kills in conjunction with other signs is the telling factor that this is not the "norm"...

[amessenger4god]

Sorry, I should have specified that I was replying to SwordofGideon's post above. I definitely agree that the earth has been slowly dying since The Fall.

[drdos]

Sorry, I should have specified that I was replying to SwordofGideon's post above. I definitely agree that the earth has been slowly dying since The Fall.

Yepper I figured that.. Blessings!

[Jericho]

Michio Kaku, the first major proponent on the media of the theory that these deaths have just been underreported until now, proved his point wrong with his own words.

On Fox News he mentioned that there are approximately 158 mass animal deaths per year (though he gave no examples of what a common "mass death" would be; the current mass deaths have been unexplainable--I imagine "common" ones are usually the result of drought and disease) and that, therefore, "nothing" is going on.

So, let's just consider the numbers. 158 mass deaths per year is the equivalent to 1 mass death every 2.3 days (about every 55 hours).

158 deaths, is that just in the US or worldwide? I don't have time to check the numbers right now, but here is the US wildlife mortality reports from 1995 to 2010 (I don't think they include fish deaths.) http://www.nwhc.usgs.gov/publications/quarterly_reports/index.jsp. (credit to burien1 for the link.)

[amessenger4god]

Ummm.... not sure actually. But if it is 158 in the U.S. only per year, then the rate is still 7.5x higher than usual, because according to the source above there were 16 mass deaths in the U.S., alone, which accounted for more than half of the reported world total during the first 5 days of the "wave". And as we've seen in the last several days there were cattle deaths in Wisconsin, bird deaths in Alabama, and bird deaths in California.

[Loop]

Even freezing to death....

7,000 BUFFALO AND COWS FREEZE TO DEATH IN VIETNAM


http://beforeitsnews.com/story/364/035/7,000_BUFFALO_AND_COWS_FREEZE_TO_DEATH_IN_VIETNAM.html