A Javier Solana Speech: Have you any links to it?

This forum is for questions about Europe and the European Union. The questions are for Farmer only. One poster per thread please.

A Javier Solana Speech: Have you any links to it?

Postby M.C.Nige on Fri May 11, 2007 5:41 am

Hi Björn

Below is an extract from an article entited

Prepare to meet your King by Bud Millington.

I'm particularly interested in the part highlighted in red. Do you know of a transcript (preferable) or audio link to a speech where Javier Solana has said what is claimed in this article?

Thanks in advance for your help. I did contact the site and they gave me a list of things that I could search for in google. To date, I haven't been able to find anything.

The Bible says this peace treaty will cause the animal sacrifices taking place in Israel to be stopped half way through the seven years. In a recent speech, the author of the ENPI, European Union High Representative, Javiar Solana (formerly the head of NATO, appointed by US President Bill Clinton) reminded all the signers of the agreement all animal sacrifices must cease in the summer of 2010…about half way through the seven years.
User avatar
M.C.Nige
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:42 am

Postby lahalbo on Fri May 11, 2007 6:50 am

Link

This is a link that takes you to the EU page that references "Improving animal welfare: EU Action Plan adopted"

There is a reference to the period 2006-2010 and five main areas of action.

:a2:
Image
lahalbo
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 6:54 am
Location: Birmingham, AL

Postby farmer on Fri May 11, 2007 7:20 am

Hi M.C.Nige and thanks lahalbo!

Thanks both of you for your input.
I do not think that there has been such a speech of Mr. S,
as mentioned in the article,
as it would be too obvious for Solana in this phase and
this "reminding" does also not resemble Solanas style.

The author combined some facts and has built kind of a shortlink
between those facts,
which still has to be proven to come true.

Mr. S is the author of Barcelona treaty
and based on this he is also author of 7 year ENP,
also with Israel. Part of this treaty are action plans,
and the Animal laws seem to be part of those action plans.
That is the connection behind this story.

Björn
User avatar
farmer
 
Posts: 2066
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Germany

Postby M.C.Nige on Fri May 11, 2007 7:43 am

Many thanks Björn and lahalbo for your quick responses.
User avatar
M.C.Nige
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:42 am

Postby farmer on Sun May 13, 2007 12:31 am

from:
PLANNED ACTIONS IN THE FIELD OF ANIMAL PROTECTION AND WELFARE
(indicates actions already underway, announced or specifically foreseen by Community legislation)

"Creation of a legislative instrument to validate farming systems applying higher welfare standards than those foreseen in applicable
legislation: 2010"
"Possible establishment of a European Quality Standard for products emanating from high animal welfare production systems and
creation of a specific technical and financial system to promote at European level the application of higher welfare standards both for
their technical developments and to market them in Europe and abroad
: 2010"
Brussels, 23.1.2006
COM(2006) 13 final
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
on a Community Action Plan on the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2006-2010
{SEC(2006) 65}
http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare ... 106_en.pdf

also here: p.3:
"In order to achieve these objectives and to ensure a
more structured approach in the different sectors involved, five main areas of action
have been identified.
These cannot be considered as stand-alone actions; there are clear linkages between
the actions foreseen necessitating a coordinated and holistic approach. A period from
2006 to 2010 is considered appropriate in order to advance the actions proposed,
with associated regular monitoring and evaluation of progress as well as follow-up
programming beyond 2010 following the completion of this first Community Action
Plan
."

p5,6:
"In the international arena full support and Community coordination will be provided for the animal welfare activities of international organisations such as the OIE and Council of Europe.
The Community will also press for the acceptance at WTO level
of animal welfare as a non-trade concern in agricultural trade and will work with international trading partners having developed animal welfare policies in order to build a common understanding on the implementation of mutually agreed animalwelfare standards, including in the context of specific EC multilateral and bilateral
agreements....

5. BUDGETARY CONSIDERATIONS
The preparation of an Action Plan per se has no implication for the Community budget. The potential budgetary implications of each individual action will be taken into account in the impact assessments to be prepared for each respective action,
[b]within the framework set for the expenditure on veterinary and phytosanitary
measures for the period 2007-2013 where relevant.

[/b] "

overview:

http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare ... lan_en.htm

next steps:
"Commission Communication on EU animal health Policy – (Strategy 2007-2013) – mid 2007

By mid 2007, the Commission will present a Commission Communication on the Community Animal Health Policy and its strategy over the period 2007-2013 based on the evaluation results and the conference conclusions. The Commission considers this communication as a priority in its Annual Policy Strategy 2007:

It will present clear objectives reflecting stakeholders’ priorities and aiming at minimising the regulatory burden.
It will ensure the coherence with our international commitments (such as the SPS agreement).
But also the close articulation of the Community Animal heath Policy with EU policies such as the Common Agriculture policy, Animal welfare, Sustainable development, External Aid, and of course Research.
This Communication will also include a concrete action plan presenting the outputs expected over the period 2007-2013 (including target deadlines). Every legal action considered in this plan will be presented with a further impact assessment.
http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/disease ... ort_en.htm

http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare ... dex_en.htm
Questions about Europe and the European Union?
Don't hesitate to ask me here at FP: "Ask Björn (Farmer)"
http://fulfilledprophecy.com/bb/viewforum.php?f=52
User avatar
farmer
 
Posts: 2066
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Germany

Postby M.C.Nige on Sun May 13, 2007 12:46 am

Thanks for all this info Björn. I'll have a detailed look in the next couple of days.
User avatar
M.C.Nige
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:42 am

Postby farmer on Sun May 13, 2007 12:53 am

"Under Directive 93/119/EEC Member States retain the right to authorise religious slaughter without prestunning in their own territory. The Directive leaves the responsibility for the respect of religious slaughtering rules with the religious authority, but places the responsibility for the enforcement of its general legal requirements directive with the official veterinary authorities. It further requires that animals slaughtered in accordance with religious rites shall be spared any avoidable suffering, pain or excitement during all stages of the slaughter process, and that a mechanical form of restraint be used to prevent injury when the animal is killed."
http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare ... ion_en.htm
http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare ... #ref93-119
User avatar
farmer
 
Posts: 2066
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Germany

Postby farmer on Sun May 13, 2007 1:00 am

"5. ACTION 5 – CONTINUE TO SUPPORT AND INITIATE FURTHER INTERNATIONAL
INITIATIVES TO RAISE AWARENESS AND CREATE A CONSENSUS ON ANIMAL
WELFARE
5.1. Background
At present there is a limited international consensus on the relative importance accorded to animal welfare and the measures in place in the EU cannot be readily compared with the standards in Third Countries. In addition differing cultural factors and traditional practices need to be borne in mind and ethical considerations clearly have an important influence on the farming and keeping of animals. The EU has
actively participated in various international fora as a means of increasing awareness
and building consensus on the importance of animal welfare. Since the 1960’s the
Council of Europe has been actively working for the protection of animals, within
the framework of various Conventions.18 The Community is party (or observer) to
several of the Council of Europe Conventions aimed at improving the welfare of
animals, including areas of animal experimentation, transport, farming and slaughter.
There are several ongoing activities at the Council of Europe where the Community
plays an active role.
Recent and future enlargements of the EU also require close attention in terms of
their consequences for the Community’s animal welfare policies.
A dialogue is
needed with countries
such as Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey and Croatia on this issue,
as well as other countries in the Western Balkans and those covered under the
European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP)
for example. Various instruments are
available to facilitate the implementation of the Community’s rules by accession
countries (e.g. TAIEX seminars to provide technical assistance and information
exchange and facilitate the sharing of experience and knowledge)..."
http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare ... 106_en.pdf
User avatar
farmer
 
Posts: 2066
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Germany

Postby farmer on Sun May 13, 2007 1:18 am

"Religious slaughter
CIWF is opposed to religious slaughter when that involves animals’ throats being cut while they are fully conscious. We believe that all animals and poultry should be stunned before slaughter. We oppose religious slaughter both because of the severe pain experienced at throat cutting by unstunned animals and because there is a prolonged period between throat cutting and loss of brain responsiveness during which animals can suffer extreme pain and distress. Our concerns are supported by the EFSA Report and Opinion. The Opinion concludes that “due to the serious animal welfare concerns associated with slaughter without stunning, pre-cut stunning should always be performed”.
The EFSA Report states that there is a high risk that animals feel extreme pain during the cutting of the throat. The Report adds (p. 22) that during the period when the animal, whose throat has been cut, is still conscious, serious welfare problems are highly likely to occur since the animal can feel anxiety, pain, distress and other suffering.
The EFSA Opinion concludes that “cuts which are used in order that rapid bleeding occurs involve substantial tissue damage in areas well supplied with pain receptors. The rapid decrease in blood pressure which follows the blood loss is readily detected by the conscious animal and elicits fear and panic. Poor welfare also results when conscious animals inhale blood because of bleeding into the trachea. Without stunning, the time between cutting through the major blood vessels and insensibility, as deduced from
behavioural and brain response, is up to 20 seconds in sheep, up to 25 seconds in pigs, up to 2 minutes in cattle, up to 2½ or more minutes in poultry, and sometimes 15 minutes or more in fish”.
The UK FAWC report on the slaughter of red meat animals is also critical of religious slaughter. It states: “When a very large transverse incision is made across the neck a number of vital tissues are transected including: skin, muscle, trachea, oesophagus, carotid arteries, jugular veins, major nerve trunks (e.g. vagus and phrenic nerves) plus numerous minor nerves. Such a drastic cut will inevitably trigger a barrage of sensory information to the brain in a sensible (conscious) animal. We are persuaded that such a massive injury would result in very significant pain and distress in the period before insensibility supervenes.”
In light of this conclusion and other welfare problems, the FAWC concluded that slaughter without pre-stunning is unacceptable and that the UK Government should repeal the current exemption which permits religious slaughter without pre-stunning.

CIWF believes that all animals (including poultry) should be stunned before throat cutting. Accordingly, the exemption in the Directive that permits religious slaughter without pre-stunning should be withdrawn.
When religious slaughter is carried out, it is essential that both carotid arteries are severed to ensure as rapid a bleed out and death as possible."

page 10,11
from
http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare ... ing_en.pdf

from a stakeholders contribution
concerning:
"All fields will be tackled in parallel and the Commission aims to adopt the proposal in October 2007. In the meantime stakeholders are invited to contribute to any of these fields.
http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare ... map_en.htm
User avatar
farmer
 
Posts: 2066
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Germany

Postby savedbygrace on Sun May 13, 2007 8:12 pm

[27] And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

'Great tribulation coming soon to a neighborhood near you'.



:popcorn:
You will be betrayed even by parents and brothers, relatives and friends; and they will put some of you to death. And you will be hated by all for My name’s sake. But not a hair of your head shall be lost. By your patience possess your souls. Luke 21:16-19
User avatar
savedbygrace
Supporting Member
 
Posts: 2954
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:35 am
Location: San Diego, CA

Postby M.C.Nige on Mon May 14, 2007 5:23 am

Yes. I think this is definitely one to keep an eye on... :thinking:

Thanks again for the additional info Björn.
User avatar
M.C.Nige
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:42 am


Return to Ask Björn (Farmer)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest