Overall, I find his findings incredibly fascinating and accurate. One qualm I have, is that for all of the investigation, in depth analysis and especially of such detailed dating of the prophetic scriptures, he forgot one very important one.
Matthew 24:15-25 (NIV)
15 “So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’[a] spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand— 16 then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. 17 Let no one on the housetop go down to take anything out of the house. 18 Let no one in the field go back to get their cloak. 19 How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! 20 Pray that your flight will not take place in winter or on the Sabbath. 21 For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now—and never to be equaled again.
22 “If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened. 23 At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. 24 For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. 25 See, I have told you ahead of time.
I would have liked to at least seen how this verse works within the timeline structure. The other qualm I had was that the man in the video seemed to use the (below) scripture quite often and because the audience would be mostly prophetic students, I felt that it was a way of cornering the audience to feel that if they don't agree with the theory presented then one could be made to feel they are 'wicked', imo; sort of an unspoken manipulation, if you will:
Daniel 12:9-10 (NIV)
9 He replied, “Go your way, Daniel, because the words are rolled up and sealed until the time of the end. 10 Many will be purified, made spotless and refined, but the wicked will continue to be wicked. None of the wicked will understand, but those who are wise will understand.
Forgive me if that seems harsh. I can understand how this scripture, v. 9 can be used to validate that certain events hadn't taken place in Daniel's time, but they way that v. 10 is used, especially throughout and at the end of the presentation seemed a bit 'off topic' and accusatory for just a theory, especially since most of the 'wicked' (unbelievers) wouldn't even be watching the video. Besides it's sort of redundant in the overall tone to those who would be this far along in their study of prophecy.