Jay Ross wrote:Mr B I have already provided a summary of the end time event as I see them, apparently very clearly and with scriptural support. The difference is that I am not a ???-tribber of any sort and this lens, of a ???-triber, that you use to interpret scripture, is where the error is on your part.
Jay Ross, I wrote what was in Scripture - it has absolutely nothing to do with what particular view one has about the Rapture.
Jay Ross wrote:It is a known fact that Israel has been quietly acquiring the parts to build the temple quickly.
Be as it may - Israel quietly acquiring parts to build the Temple. What you have failed to do is support that a Temple will be built prior to the Return of Christ. Many want to use 2 Thessalonians 2:4 as evidence that a rebuilt Temple will have to be made prior to the Return of Christ - well that is still very much debatable.
Jay Ross wrote:Rev 19 and Rev 20 are not sequential as you understand these two chapters to be. Therein lies your problem with you understanding of these two chapters.
Yes, you are correct. I do wholeheartedly believe that Revelation 19 and 20 are sequential. It is the ONLY way that Scripture works in HARMONY with the rest of Scripture. Other parts of the Book of Revelation may not be - but MOST Certainly Revelation 19 & 20 are. Unless you understand this - you will be very wrong in your own private interpretation.
Jay Ross wrote:It seems to me that you are pushing a “pre-trib”/”pre-millennium” theory and it does not stack up.
For the Record, I am not pushing any particular Rapture View - and especially NOT the Pretribulation Rapture. Anyone who has known what I have posted about End Time events knows that I wholehearted DISAGREE with the Pretribulation Rapture theory. So - lets not go there. It amazes me that you say that I am pushing a "pre-millennium" theory yet in your comment below you state that I am "pushing that the Millennium Age is not a literal age"

Jay Ross wrote:You are also pushing that the Millennium Age is not a literal age with your study in this thread.
Jay Ross, if you CAREFULLY read what I have written you will plainly see that I am NOT pushing anything. But I am just simply trying to discover the TRUTH - with the help of others who properly divide the Word of God.
At this point - You have proven to me that you want to "REARRANGE" Scripture and/or ADD to it and TAKE AWAY from it as YOU deem necessary. This has been a PROVEN fact with the comments you have made on various posts.
I find this most unfortunate. Has there been anyone here on this forum that you haven't attempted to throw stones at as it relates to End Time Prophecy

Could it be that it's YOU that is very WRONG

It would be a very good idea for you not to rearrange Scripture to fit a particular view point that YOU have, or make it work the way that YOU want it to be. It's NOT about your PRIVATE Interpretation Jay Ross. One very prime example is:
If you cannot understand that Revelation 19 and 20 are sequential - then you are NOT properly interpreting Scripture.
Another good idea may be to ask yourself:
"Why is it that I cause so much controversy with each and every member of this forum when I post my views?"

Well it's because YOU Jay Ross, want to add your own PRIVATE INTERPRETATION to Scripture - and rearrange it to suit YOU, and what YOU believe. Again, I find it most unfortunate.